Stock Market Returns of ‘AAA’-Rated Companies Lagging Behind S&P 500 Benchmark

Standard & Poor’s has updated its 2008 analysis of the correlation between credit ratings and price performance for S&P stocks, and finds that investment grade companies as a group continue to outperform speculative grade firms. But interestingly, the highest-rated companies underperformed the benchmark as a group in the last few years and have lagged ‘BBB’-rated firms.

The update takes into account the effects of the equity market’s crash and its subsequent rebound.

Key findings:

  • Stocks of investment-grade rated companies (particularly ‘A+’ to ‘A-’ rated companies) in the S&P 500 outperformed the overall index.
  • Stocks of speculative-grade rated companies in the S&P 500 underperformed the overall index.
  • Stock performance of companies not rated by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services fell in the middle of investment- and speculative-grade rated companies, underperforming the index.

This suggests that the creation of low-cost mutual funds or exchange-traded funds that track the performance of only the investment-grade companies or long/short versions that also short the speculative-grade companies would be attractive investments and thus worthwhile as new index-related products.

When looking at portfolios based on individual ratings, the investment-grade portfolios outperformed, with the exception of the ‘AAA’ to ‘AA-’ portfolio, which has fallen behind ‘BBB’-rated companies since 2007.

S&P500

For details, see Market Intellect: How Equity Performance Tracks The Credit Quality Of S&P 500 Companies (Premium)

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.